Systems and Means of Informatics
2022, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 73-82
INTERRELATION BETWEEN THE SOFTWARE-DEFINED AND CONVENTIONAL IP-NETWORKS
Abstract
Software-defined networking (SDN) is a centralized network control concept that postulates concentration of all control plane functions in a logically single programmatic network controller, simplification of data plane nodes to primitive switches, and a unified protocol, OpenFlow, particularly, of interaction between them and the controller. The SDN idea was born and initially implemented within academic laboratories. However, its expansion to data centers and, subsequently, to provider networks revealed a number of weak spots. The network bootstrapping and remote configuring were among them since these procedures cannot be accomplished using solely the OpenFlow means and do not fit into the original SDN framework. The SDN networks deployment practice showed the impracticability of the refusal from the TCP/IP protocol stack which remains indispensable, in particular, for SDN network bootstrapping and remote configuring. As a result, in the reality, we observe the SDN network nodes as some traditional full-fledged routers, only augmented with the supplementary OpenFlow functionality, instead of the conceptual simple pure OpenFlow switches, while the SDN networks themselves remain trivial IP networks with the centralized control being not full-sufficient and provided as an optional supplement.
[+] References (14)
- Barskov, A. 2012. SDN: komu i zachem eto nado? [SDN: Whom and what for is it necessary?]. Zh. setevykh resheniy/LAN [Network Solutions Journal/LAN] 12:13033012. Available at: https://www.osp.ru/lan/2012/12/13033012 (accessed February 11, 2022).
- Egorov, V. B. 2019. Praktichnoe opredelenie "programmno opredelyaemogo" [A practical definition of "software-defined"]. Sistemy i Sredstva Informatiki - Systems and Means of Informatics 29(2):85-94.
- Foukas, X., M.K. Marina, and K. Kontovasilis. 2015. Software-defined networking concept. Software Defined Mobile Networks (SDMN): Beyond LTE network architecture. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 21-44. doi: 10.1002/ 9781118900253 .CH3.
- Egorov, V. B. 2016. Nekotorye voprosy prakticheskoy realizatsii kontseptsii SDN [Some issues of the SDN concept practical implementation]. Sistemy i Sredstva Informatiki - Systems and Means of Informatics 26(1):109-120.
- OpenFlow switch specification: Version 1.3.5. ONF TS 023. 2015. Open Networking Foundation. 177 p. Available at: https://opennetworking.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2014/10/openflow-switch-v1.3.5.pdf (accessed February 11, 2022).
- Jalili, A., H. Nazari, S. Namvarasl, and M. Keshtgari. 2017. A comprehensive analysis on control plane deployment in SDN: In-band versus out-of-band solutions. 4th Conference (International) on Knowledge-Based Engineering and Innovation Proceedings. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. 1025-1031. doi: 10.1109/KBEI.2017.8324949.
- Sakic, E., M. Avdic, A. VanBemten, and W. Kellerer. 2020. Automated bootstrapping of a fault-resilient in-band control plane. Symposium on SDN Research Proceedings. New York, NY: ACM. 1-13.
- Sharma, S., D. Staessens, D. Colle, M. Pickavet, and P. Demeester. 2013. Automatic boot-strapping of OpenFlow networks. 19th IEEE Workshop on Local & Metropolitan Area Networks Proceedings. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. 6528283. 6 p. doi: 10.1109/ LANMAN.2013.6528283.
- Lopez-Pajares, D., J. Alvarez-Horcajo, E. Rojas, A. S. M. Asadujjaman, and
I. Martinez-Yelmo. 2019. Amaru: Plug&play resilient in-band control for SDN. IEEE Access 7:123202-123218.
- Canini, M., I. Salem, L. Schiff, E. M. Schiller, and S. Schmid. 2017. A self-organizing distributed and in-band SDN control plane. 37th IEEE Conference (International) on Distributed Computing Systems Proceedings. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. 2656-2657.
- OF-CONFIG 1.2. OpenFlow Management and Configuration Protocol: ONFTS-016. Open Networking Foundation. 44 p. Available at: https://opennetworking.org/wp- content/uploads/2013/02/of-config-1.2.pdf (accessed February 11, 2022).
- Loginov, S. 2017. Ob urovnyakh upravleniya v programmno-konfiguriruemoy seti (SDN) [About the control planes in the software-defined networking]. T-Comm: Telekommunikatsii i transport [T-Comm] 11(3):50-55.
- Egorov, V. B. 2017. Nekotorye voprosy programmnogo opredeleniyatsentrov obrabotki dannykh [Some issues of software-defined data centers]. Sistemy i Sredstva Informatiki - Systems and Means of Informatics 30(2): 105-114.
- Sushkov, A. 2016. SDN &NFV ipri chemtut oblaka [SDN &NFV and what the clouds have to do with them]. Habr. Available at: https://habr.com/ru/company/billing/ blog/316324/ (accessed February 11, 2022).
[+] About this article
Title
INTERRELATION BETWEEN THE SOFTWARE-DEFINED AND CONVENTIONAL IP-NETWORKS
Journal
Systems and Means of Informatics
Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 73-82
Cover Date
2022-05-10
DOI
10.14357/08696527220107
Print ISSN
0869-6527
Publisher
Institute of Informatics Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences
Additional Links
Key words
bootstrapping; software-defined networking; remote network configuring; OF-CONFIG; OpenFlow
Authors
V. B. Egorov
Author Affiliations
Federal Research Center "Computer Science and Control", Russian Academy of Sciences, 44-2 Vavilov Str., Moscow 119333, Russian Federation
|