Systems and Means of Informatics
2014, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 186-205
CHARACTERISTICS OF NATIONAL SECURITY INDICATORS IN THE CONTEXT OF ITS INFORMATION MONITORING
- G. V. Lukyanov
- D. A. Nikishin
- G. F. Verevkin
- V. V. Kosarik
Abstract
The article is devoted to problems of methodology of creation of the system of monitoring and indicator assessment of national security of the
Russian Federation. The main attention is paid to development and justification of the requirements for indicators which are used for national security assessment.
The purpose of this research is to develop a methodological basis for studying completeness and adequacy of the metrics used in the system in order to form a generalized assessment of national security of the Russian Federation in the medium and long terms. Application of the major components of the program- target approach using the developed methodology enables the use of monitoring tools to assess compliance of the results of activities in the sphere of national security, as well as attracted to this activities resource with the aims and objectives of national security provision.
[+] References (27)
- Pospelov, G. S., andV. A. Irikov. 1976. Programmno-tselevoeplanirovanieiupravlenie [Program and target planning and management]. Moscow: Sovetskoe radio [Soviet radio]. 440 p.
- Pospelov, G. S., ed. 1981. Problemyprogrammno-tselevogoplanirovaniyaiupravleniya [Problems of program and target planning and management]. Moscow: Fizmatlit. 464 p.
- Ruegg, R., ed. 2004. Planning for performance and evaluating results of public R&D programs: Meeting the OMB PART Challenge. Washington: The Washington Re-search Evaluation Network. Workshop Executive Summary Report. 86 ð. Available at: http://www.scienceofsciencepolicy.net/sites/default/files/attachments/WREN2003 DecWorkshopReport.pdf (accessed October 14, 2014).
- Laverov, N. P., ed. 2008. Problemy natsional'noy bezopasnosti: Ekspertnye zak- lyucheniya, analiticheskie materialy, predlozheniya [Problems of national security: Expert opinions, analytical materials, offers]. Moscow: Nauka. 459 p.
- NORAD. 1992. The logical framework approach: Handbook for objectives-oriented planning. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Agency for International Development. 109 p.
- DANIDA. 1995. Logical framework approach: A flexible tool for participatory development. Copenhagen, Denmark. 126 p.
- Mosse, R., and L. E. Sontheimer. 1996. Monitoring indicators: A handbook for task managers. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. World Bank Technical Paper No. 334. 60 p. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/ BRAZILINPOREXTN /Resources/3817166-1185895645304/4044168- 1186409169154/24pub_br217.pdf (accessed October 15, 2014).
- Collins, E.L., ed. 1996. Assessing fundamental science. Washington, DC: Office of Science and Technology Policy. Report from the Subcommittee on Research Committee on Fundamental Science National Science and Technology Council. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/ostp/assess/start.htm (accessed October 14, 2014).
- Collins, E. 1997. Fundamental science and federal management reform. D-Lib Magazine 3(9). 58 p. Available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september97/09collins.html (accessed
- Luk'yanov, G. V., D. A. Nikishin, and G. F. Verevkin. 2014. Informatsionnoe obe- spechenie monitoringa natsional'noy bezopasnosti v regional'nom razreze [Information support of monitoring of national security in a regional section]. Sistemy i Sredstva Informatiki - Systems and Means of Informatics 24(2):193-203.
- Zatsman, I.M., and P. S. Buntman. 2014 (in press). Proektirovanie indikatorov monitoringa v sfere nauki: Teoreticheskie osnovaniya i modeli [Design of indicators of monitoring in the sphere of science: Theoretical bases and models]. Ontologiya Proektirovaniya [Design Ontology] 3.
- Zatsman, I. M. 2005. Terminologicheskiy analiz normativno-pravovogo obespecheniya sozdaniya sistem monitoringa i otsenki rezul'tativnosti v sfere nauki [The terminological analysis of standard legal support of creation of systems of monitoring and assessment of productivity in the sphere of science]. Ekonomicheskaya Nauka Sovremennoy Rossii [Economic Science of Modern Russia] 4:114-129.
- Court of Auditors. 2008. Special Report No. 9/2007 concerning Evaluating the EU Research and Technological Development (RTD) framework programmes - could the Commission's approach be improved? Official J. European Union C 26/1. 1-38. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ AUTO/?uri=CELEX:52007SA0009&qid=1413297063783&rid=9 (accessed October 14, 2014).
- Medvedev, D. A. 2009. Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 12 maya 2009 g. No. 537 "O Strategii natsional'noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2020 go- da" [The decree of the President of the Russian Federation of May 12, 2009 No. 537 "About Strategy of national security of the Russian Federation till 2020"]. Rossiyskaya gazeta [The Russian newspaper] No. 4912 of May 19, 2009. Available at: http://www.rg.ru/2009/05/19/strategia-dok.html (accessed October 15, 2014).
- Zatsman, I. M., and A. A. Durnovo. 2010. Incompleteness problem for indicators sys-tem of research programme. 11th Conference (International) on Science and Technology Indicators (STI'2010): Book of abstracts. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden. 309-311.
- Golikova, T.A., and A. V. Sharonov. 2005. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po podgotovke dokladov o rezul'tatakh i osnovnykh napravleniyakh deyatel'nosti sub"ektov byudzhetnogo planirovaniya na 2006-2008 gody ot 27 iyunya 2005 g. No. 02-AL/2008. [Methodical recommendations about preparation of reports on results and the main activities of subjects of budget planning for 2006-2008 of June 27, 2005 No. 02-AL/2008]. Moscow: Ministerstvo finansov Rossiyskoy Federatsii. [Moscow: Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation]. 33 ð. Available at: http://www.minfin.ru/common/img/uploaded/library/2005/07/metod_270705.doc (accessed October 15, 2014).
- LeporiB., R. Barre, and G. Filliatreau. 2008. New perspectives and challenges for the design and production of S&T indicators. Res. Eval. 17(1):33-44.
- Zatsman, I.M., and A. A. Durnovo. 2011. Modelirovanie protsessov formirovaniya ekspertnykh znaniy dlya monitoringa programmno-tselevoy deyatel'nosti [Modeling of processes of formation of expert knowledge for monitoring program and target activity]. Informatika i ee Primeneniya - Inform. Appl. 5(4):84-98.
- Zatsman, I. M, and A. A. Durnovo. 2012. Proactive dictionary of evaluation system as atoolfor S&T indicator development. 17th Conference (International) on Science and Technology Indicators Proceedings. Eds. E. Archambault, Y. Gingras, and V. Larivi- ere. Montreal: Science-Metrix and OST. 2:905-906.
- Zatsman, I. M, and P. S. Buntman. 2013. Theoretical framework and senotatum- based models of knowledge creation for monitoring and evaluating R&D program implementation. Int. J. Softw. Sci. Comput. Intell. 5(1):15-31.
- Zatsman, I.M., and S.K. Shubnikov. 2010. Metody verifitsiruemogo otsenivaniya tselevykh programm nauchnykh issledovaniy [Methods of the verified estimation of target programs of scientific researches]. Sistemy i Sredstva Informatiki - Systems and Means of Informatics 20(2):23-48.
- Shubnikov, S. K. 2005. Formy dokumentov v sistemakh informatsionnogo obespeche- niya otsenki rezul'tativnosti nauchnoy deyatel'nosti [Forms of documents in systems of information support of an assessment of productivity of scientific activity]. Sistemy i Sredstva Informatiki - Systems and Means of Informatics 15:59-76.
- Zatsman, I. M. 2005. Informatsionnye resursy dlya sistem monitoringa v sfere nauki [Information resources for systems of monitoring in the sphere of science]. Sistemy i Sredstva Informatiki - Systems and Means of Informatics 15 (2): 88-318.
- Buddenberg, R. 2002. FORCENet: We've been here before. Available at: http:// www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA461312 (accessed October 15, 2014).
- Buddenberg, R. 2006. Toward an interoperability reference model. Available at: http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA502999 (accessed October 15, 2014).
- GOST 34.602-89. 1989. Tekhnicheskoe zadanie na sozdanie avtomatizirovannoy siste- my [The specification on creation of the automated system]. Moscow: Publishing House of Standards. 10 p. Available at: http://prj-exp.ru/gost/gost_34-602-89.php (accessed October 15, 2014).
- Nikolaev, I. A., and O. S. Tochilkina. 2011. Ekonomicheskaya differentsiatsiya re- gionov: Otsenki, dinamika, sravneniya. Analiticheskiy doklad [Economic differentiation of regions: Estimates, dynamics, comparisons. Analytical report]. Moscow: Accountants & Busines Advisers. 28 p.
[+] About this article
Title
CHARACTERISTICS OF NATIONAL SECURITY INDICATORS IN THE CONTEXT OF ITS INFORMATION MONITORING
Journal
Systems and Means of Informatics
Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 186-205
Cover Date
2013-11-30
DOI
10.14357/08696527140412
Print ISSN
0869-6527
Publisher
Institute of Informatics Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences
Additional Links
Key words
monitoring of national security of the Russian Federation; information monitoring; indicator assessment; output indicators; outcome indicators
Authors
G. V. Lukyanov , D. A. Nikishin ,
G. F. Verevkin , and V. V. Kosarik
Author Affiliations
Institute of Informatics Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, 44-2 Vavilov Str., Moscow 119333, Russian Federation
|