Informatics and Applications
2023, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 88-95
EVALUATING THE DEGREE OF DISCOURSE RELATIONS SEMANTIC AFFINITY: METHODS AND INSTRUMENTS
- O. Yu. Inkova
- M. G. Kruzhkov
Abstract
The methods for evaluating semantic affinity of discourse relations are examined. The authors propose several approaches to this problem using two information resources: a collection of structured definitions of logical- semantic relations (LSRs) formed by the authors and the Supracorpora Database of Connectives incorporating corpus-based annotations of translation correspondences that include text fragments with LSR markers in Russian, French, and Italian. It is demonstrated that when it comes to assessing the semantic affinity of LSRs, the following factors will be of a higher priority: affiliation of distinctive features of LSRs with the same family in the structured definitions of relations; correspondences between markers of different LSRs in the source and target texts; and cases when different LSRs are regularly expressed by the same markers in different contexts. Of a lesser importance is the factor of compatibility of different LSRs within the same context. It is assumed that based on the proposed methods, it will become possible to specify more precisely which distinguishing features of LSRs have the greatest impact on their potential semantic affinity.
[+] References (22)
- Hobbs, J. R. 1976. A computational approach to discourse analyses. New York, NY: Department of Computer Science, City College, City University ofNew York. Research Report 76-2. 28-38.
- Hobbs, J. R. 1978. Why is discourse coherent? Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. SRI Technical Note 176. 44 p.
- Halliday, M. A. K., and R. Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman. 374 p.
- Mann, W. C., and S. A. Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical structure theory: Towards a functional theory of text organization. Text 8(3):243-281.doi: 10.1515/text.1.1988.8.3.243.
- Asher, N. 1993. Reference to abstract objects in discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 455 p.
- Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar. 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold. 434 p.
- PDTB Research Group. 2007. The Penn Discourse Tree- bank 2.0 annotation manual. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, University of Pennsylvania. Technical Report IRCS-08-01. 104 p. Available at: https://www.cis.upenn.edu/~elenimi/pdtb- manual.pdf (accessed November 28, 2023).
- Breindl, E., A. Volodina, and U. H. WaBner. 2014. Handbuch der deutschen Konnektoren 2: Semantik der deutschen Satzverknupfer. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 1327 p.
- Inkova, O. Yu. 2019. Logiko-semanticheskie otnosheniya: problemy klassifikatsii [Logical-semantic relations: Classification problems]. Svyaznost' teksta: mereologicheskie logiko-semanticheskie otnosheniya [Text coherence: Mereological logical semantic relations]. Moscow: LRC Publishing House. 11-98.
- Asher, N., and A. Lascarides. 2003. Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 526 p.
- Carlson, L., and D. Marcu. 2001. Discourse tagging reference manual. Marina del Rey, CA: Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California. Technical Report ISI-TR-545. 87 p. Available at: https://www.isi.edu/ marcu/discourse/tagging-ref- manual.pdf (accessed November 28, 2023).
- Chiarcos, Ch. 2014. Towards interoperable discourse annotation: Discourse features in the Ontologies of Linguistic Annotation. 9th Conference (International) on Language Resources and Evaluation Proceedings. Eds. N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, et al. Reykjavik, Iceland: European Language Resources Association. 4569-4577.
- Benamara, F., and M. Taboada. 2015. Mapping different rhetorical relation annotations: A proposal. 4th Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics. Eds. M. Palmer, G. Boleda, and P. Rosso. Denver, CO, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics. 147-152. doi: 10.18653/v1/S15-1016.
- Sanders, T., V. Demberg, J. Hoek, M. Scholman, F. T. Asr,
S. Zufferey, and J. Evers-Vermeul. 2018. Unifying dimensions in coherence relations: How various annotation frameworks are related. Corpus Linguist. Ling. 17(1):1-71. doi: 10.1515/cllt-2016-0078.
- Inkova, O. Yu. 2021. Opredeleniya diskursivnykh otnosheniy: opyt Nadkorpusnoy bazy dannykh konnektorov [Definition of discursive relations: The experience of the supracorpora database of connectors]. Komp'yuternaya lingvistika i intellektual'nye Tekhnologii: Po mat-lam ezhegodnoy Mezhdunar. konf. "Dialog" [Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies: Papers from the Annual Conference (International) "Dialogue"]. Moscow: RGGU. 20(27):328-338.
- Inkova, O. Yu., and M. G. Kruzhkov. 2021. Strukturirovannye opredeleniya diskursivnykh otnosheniy v Nadkorpusnoy baze dannykh konnektorov [Structured definitions of discourse relations in the Supracorpora Database of Connectives]. Informatika i ee Primeneniya - Inform. Appl. 15(4):27-32. doi: 10.14357/ 19922264210404. EDN: EZJXVI.
- Inkova, O.Yu., and M.G. Kruzhkov. 2023. Kriterii opredeleniya semanticheskoy blizosti diskursivnykh otnosheniy [Evaluation criteria for discourse relations semantic affinity]. Informatika i ee Primeneniya - Inform. Appl. 17(3):100-106. doi: 10.14357/19922264230314. EDN: UJZJZI.
- Inkova, O. Yu., and V. A. Nuriev. 2018. Naskol'ko lingvospetsifichen soyuz khotya? [To what extent is the conjunction khotya language-specific?]. Komp'yuternaya lingvistika i intellektual'nye tekhnologii: Po mat-lam ezhegodnoy Mezhdunar. konf. "Dialog" [Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies: Papers from the Annual Conference (International) "Dialogue"]. Moscow: RGGU. 17(24):254-266.
- Chernyshev, V. I., ed. 1950-1965. Slovar' sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo yazyka [Dictionary of modern Russian literary language]. In 17 vols. Moscow, Leningrad: USSR Academy of Sciences Publishing House/Nauka.
- Shvedova, N. Yu., ed. 1980. Russkaya grammatika [Russian grammar]. Moscow: Nauka. Vol. 2. 714 p.
- Evgen'eva, A. P., ed. 1981-1984. Slovar' russkogo yazyka [Dictionary of the Russian language]. Moscow: Russkiy yazyk. 4 vols.
- Heine, B., and T. Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 387 p.
[+] About this article
Title
EVALUATING THE DEGREE OF DISCOURSE RELATIONS SEMANTIC AFFINITY: METHODS AND INSTRUMENTS
Journal
Informatics and Applications
2023, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 88-95
Cover Date
2023-12-10
DOI
10.14357/19922264230412
Print ISSN
1992-2264
Publisher
Institute of Informatics Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences
Additional Links
Key words
supracorpora database; logical-semantic relations; connectives; annotation; faceted classification
Authors
O. Yu. Inkova , and M. G. Kruzhkov
Author Affiliations
Federal Research Center "Computer Science and Control" of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 44-2 Vavilov Str., Moscow 119333, Russian Federation
University of Geneva, 22 Bd des Philosophes, CH-1205 Geneva 4, Switzerland
|