Informatics and Applications
2023, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 100-106
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR DISCOURSE RELATIONS SEMANTIC AFFINITY
- O. Yu. Inkova
- M. G. Kruzhkov
Abstract
The paper presents an overview of structured definitions of discourse relations created based on classification principles and criteria for evaluating their semantic affinity. The authors point out the shortcomings of existing classification approaches that are sometimes inconsistent or contradictory and outline the benefits of an alternative approach to classification of discourse relations which is based on their structured definition.
The paper provides examples of such definitions created within the Supracorpora Database of Connectives and discusses the criteria for evaluating their semantic closeness. As the structured definitions are represented by sets of distinguishing features, the authors discuss the problem of identifying proximity factors for each of these features.
The gathered data suggest a hypothesis that among the three groups of features: "Level," "Basic operation," and "Feature family", it is the last one that should have the most impact. Finally, directions for further research of this problem are considered, namely, the option of taking into account such factors as compatibility of discourse relations, correspondence of relations between the source text and its translation, and such cases where certain relation markers may express different discourse relations in various contexts.
[+] References (20)
- Hobbs, J. R. 1976. A computational approach to discourse analyses. New York, NY: Department of Computer Science, City College, City University ofNew York. Research Report 76-2. 28-38.
- Hobbs, J. R. 1978. Why is discourse coherent? Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. SRI Technical Note 176. 44 p.
- Hobbs, J. R. 1979. Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Sci. 3(1):67-90.
- Shvedova, N. Yu., ed. 1980. Russkaya grammatika. [Russian grammar]. Moscow: Nauka. Vol. 2. 714 p.
- Starodumova, E. A., E. S. Sheremet'eva, and V. N. Zav'yalov, eds. 2022. Leksikograficheskie portrety sluzhebnykh slov [Lexicographic portraits of auxiliary words]. Vladivostok: FEFU. 322 p.
- Mann, W. C., and S. A. Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical structure theory: Towards a functional theory of text organization. Text 8(3):243-281.doi: 10.1515/text.1.1988.8.3.243.
- Knott, A., and R. Dale. 1994. Using linguistic phenomena to motivate a set of coherence relations. Discourse Process. 18(1):35-62. doi: 10.1080/01638539409544883.
- Rudolph, E. 1996. Contrast: Adversative and concessive expressions on sentence and text level. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter. 564 p.
- Fraser, B. 2009. An account of discourse markers. International Review Pragmatics 1(2):293-320. doi: 10.1163/187730909X12538045489818.
- PDTB Research Group. 2008. The Penn Discourse Treebank 2.0 annotation manual. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, University of Pennsylvania. Technical Report IRCS-08-01. 99 p. Available at: https://www.cis.upenn.edu/~elenimi/ pdtb-manual.pdf (accessed August 1, 2023).
- Breindl, E., A. Volodina, and U. H. Wafiner. 2014. Hand- buch der deutschen Konnektoren 2. Semantik der deutschen Satzverkniipfer. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 1327 p.
- Inkova, O. Yu. 2019. Logiko-semanticheskie otnosheniya: problemy klassifikatsii [Logical-semantic relations: Classification problems]. Svyaznost' teksta: mereologicheskie logiko-semanticheskie otnosheniya [Text Coherence: MereologicalLogical Semantic Relations]. Moscow: LRC Publs. 11-98.
- Webber, B., R. Prasad, A. Lee, and A. Joshi. 2019. The Penn Discourse Treebank 3.0 annotation manual. 81 p. Available at: https://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/docs/ LDC2019T05/PDTB3-Annotation-Manual.pdf (ac-cessed August 1, 2023).
- Inkova, O. Yu., and M.G. Kruzhkov. 2021. Strukturirovannye opredeleniya diskursivnykh otnosheniy v Nadkorpusnoy baze dannykh konnektorov [Structured definitions of discourse relations in the Supracorpora Database of Connectives]. Informatika i ee Primeneniya - Inform. Appl. 15(4):27-32. doi: 10.14357/19922264210404.
- Inkova, O. Yu., ed. 2018. Semantika konnektorov: Kontrastivnoe issledovanie [Semantics of connectives: Contrastive study]. Moscow: TORUS PRESS. 368 p.
- Inkova, O. Yu., ed. 2019. Struktura konnektorov i metody ee opisaniya [Structure of connectors and methods of its description]. Moscow: TORUS PRESS. 316 p.
- Kruzhkov, M. G. 2021. Kontseptsiya postroeniya nadkorpusnykh baz dannykh [Conceptual framework for supracorpora databases]. Sistemy i Sredstva Informatiki - Systems and Means of Informatics 31(3):101-112. doi: 10.14357/08696527210309.
- Inkova, O. Yu. 2021. Opredeleniya diskursivnykh otnosheniy: opyt Nadkorpusnoy bazy dannykh konnektorov [Definition of discursive relations: The experience of the
supracorpora database of connectors]. Komp'yuternaya
lingvistika i intellektual'nye tekhnologii: Po mat-m ezhegodnoy Mezhdunar konf. "Dialog" [Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies: Papers from the Annual Conference (International) "Dialogue"]. Moscow:
RGGU. 20(27):328-338.
- Morkovkin, V. V., ed. 1997. Slovar' strukturnykh slov russkogo yazyka [Dictionary of structural words of the Russian
language]. Moscow: Lazur'. 422 p.
- Inkova, O. Yu., and M. G. Kruzhkov. 2019. Sochetaemost'
logiko-semanticheskikh otnosheniy: kolichestvennye metody analiza [Compatibility of logical semantic relations:
Methods of quantitative analysis]. Informatika i ee Primeneniya - Inform. Appl. 13(2):83-91. doi: 10.14357/19922264190212.
[+] About this article
Title
EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR DISCOURSE RELATIONS SEMANTIC AFFINITY
Journal
Informatics and Applications
2023, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 100-106
Cover Date
2023-10-10
DOI
10.14357/19922264230314
Print ISSN
1992-2264
Publisher
Institute of Informatics Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences
Additional Links
Key words
supracorpora database; logical-semantic relations; connectives; annotation; faceted classification
Authors
O. Yu. Inkova , and M. G. Kruzhkov
Author Affiliations
Federal Research Center "Computer Science and Control" of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 44-2 Vavilov Str., Moscow 119333, Russian Federation
University of Geneva, 22 Bd des Philosophes, CH-1205 Geneva 4, Switzerland
|